超声波清洗机作为工业重要清洗设备，其清洗效率和清洗效果成为人们重点关注之事。如果工件清洗效果不佳，将影响工件的二次加工，因此，人们需研究出可监控超声波清洗机清洗效果的方法，确保工件清洗效果良好。根据相关研究，可采用毛玻璃片法、铝箔测试法和超声能量瓶检测法检测工件的清洗效果。

As an important industrial cleaning equipment, the cleaning efficiency and effectiveness of ultrasonic cleaning machines have become a key concern for people. If the cleaning effect of the workpiece is poor, it will affect the secondary processing of the workpiece. Therefore, it is necessary to study methods that can monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines to ensure good cleaning effect of the workpiece. According to relevant research, the cleaning effect of workpieces can be tested using the ground glass plate method, aluminum foil testing method, and ultrasonic energy bottle testing method.

在运用铝箔测试法监测超声波清洗机清洗效果时发现，10μm的铝箔纸在测试时受损较为严重，无法判断清洗效果，而其他厚度的铝箔测试的合格率差距相对较小。通过监测试验发现，厚度超过20μm的铝箔纸作为检测工具时，清洗效果更加明显，监测起来也更加方便。运用毛玻璃片或超声能量瓶监测超声波清洗机清洗效果时发现，监测物品大小并不影响监测效果，但放置的位置会有一定影响。为了确保监测的准确性，需要分别根据清洗时间、清洗温度和清洗频率设计不同的试验组，且每组的试验数量都达到相关要求。

When using the aluminum foil testing method to monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines, it was found that 10 μ The aluminum foil paper of m was severely damaged during testing, making it difficult to determine the cleaning effect, while the difference in pass rates for other thicknesses of aluminum foil testing is relatively small. Through monitoring experiments, it was found that the thickness exceeded 20 μ When m's aluminum foil is used as a detection tool, the cleaning effect is more obvious and monitoring is more convenient. When using ground glass sheets or ultrasonic energy bottles to monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines, it was found that the size of the monitored item does not affect the monitoring effect, but the placement position will have a certain impact. To ensure the accuracy of monitoring, it is necessary to design different test groups based on cleaning time, cleaning temperature, and cleaning frequency, and the number of tests in each group should meet the relevant requirements.

人们同时使用三种方法监测超声波清洗机清洗效果时发现，铝箔测试法和超声能量瓶检测法的监测合格率明显低于毛玻璃片法，监测的结果更为准确。由此可见，铝箔测试法和超声能量瓶检测法更加适合于监测超声波清洗机的清洗效果，如果条件不允许，人们再退而求其次地选择毛玻璃片法，并且将毛玻璃片竖放于清洗机的四角位置，提高监测的难度。

When people use three methods simultaneously to monitor the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines, it is found that the monitoring qualification rate of aluminum foil testing method and ultrasonic energy bottle testing method is significantly lower than that of ground glass plate method, and the monitoring results are more accurate. From this, it can be seen that the aluminum foil testing method and the ultrasonic energy bottle testing method are more suitable for monitoring the cleaning effect of ultrasonic cleaning machines. If conditions do not allow, people will choose the ground glass plate method second and foremost, and place the ground glass plate vertically at the four corners of the cleaning machine to increase the difficulty of monitoring.